Skip to main content

How This Video-Rental-Store Became the Custodian of Nostalgia

This video, detailing the story of video-store 20th Century Flicks, encapsulates the brand’s nostalgic identity and highlights how this identity has developed over time. This mini-documentary does this by (1) developing a deep and broad awareness of the brands personality, (2) distinguishing between this brand and others similar, (3) detailing what this brand means to the consumer, and (4) highlighting the unique relationship between the brand and the broader community. 

https://vimeo.com/393154444

(1) I believe this mini-documentary develops a deep and broad awareness of brand personality because it describes where the video store fits in the (now virtually non-existent) industry. It details the video-rental-store culture of the past, and explains how 20th Century Flicks found success in that era. For me, nothing quite characterised my primary school sleepovers like take-away, too much soft-drink, and renting a movie. This mini-documentary perfectly encapsulates where this brand was positioned in that period, and in doing so, creates a storyscape which allows the audience to imagine, as I did, the history of the store and the consumption experience (Arnould & Hampton, 2012). 

(2) In my opinion, this mini-documentary distinguishes 20th Century Flicks from other video-rental-stores in that it is run for passion, not for profit. In detailing the fall of the video rental industry, the mini-documentary creates a story of a lopsided battle against the global streaming service giants, which, despite the acknowledged superior value of streaming, leaves the audience cheering for the underdog. Ironically, it is 20th Century Flick’s rejection of profit-seeking which allowed it to survive when other video-rental-stores didn’t.



















(3) I think that this mini-documentary thoroughly explains what 20th Century Flicks means to the customer. At 3:43, a co-owner explains that the person-to-person interaction is what customers find most valuable. For me, this brings me back to my childhood experience discussing movies with the store staff. Evidence of the importance of personal interaction is noted in other industries, studies conducted in the ‘curtain retail industry’ demonstrates that personal interaction is positively associated with customer loyalty to staff (Yuen & Chan, 2010). 

(4) What stands out the most to me about this mini-documentary is how it captures the cult-following and intense brand loyalty of 20th Century Flicks. This is described at 6:07, with references to media stories detailing the miraculous existence of this store against great adversity. This contributes to the preexisting emotional connection people have to the video-rental-store, and transforms the connection people have away from the value they derive through product use, towards supporting the preservation of a culturally significant collection. 

In conclusion, 20th Century Flicks have become the custodians of a period which espouses nostalgia in many loyal customers, the video-rental-store has transcended the status of a novelty store through the value they create in their cinema. The question is, how long can 20th Century Flicks rely on the strong marketing power of nostalgia? When generations pass and the passion for the past dies, will this project have the means to preserve their incredible collection?





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Can Spotify Build Brand Equity When Music is Free?

Spotify can build brand equity as effectively as Zara, and similar brands, despite the fact that its basic offering is free and intangible in comparison. It does so because, in comparison to Zara (1) it still has the ability to develop strong brand salience, (2) it can demonstrate brand meaning through performance and imagery, and (3) is extremely effective at developing brand resonance through community engagement. Can Spotify Build Brand Identity as Effectively as Zara? Spotify is in a position to develop brand salience (brand awareness) because it can clearly describe what service category the brand competes in, and can ensure customers know which of their needs the brand is designed to satisfy (Keller, 2001). When compared to Zara, although both operate in different industries and provide for different needs, both are in a position to influence the likelihood they will form part of a customer’s usage consideration set, which is an important function of brand salience. Spot...

The Battle for CBBE: How do Other Theories Compare to Keller?

I believe that the CAA Integrated Brand Equity model by Wang et al (2008) is the best modern support for Keller’s CBBE model, and best focuses on the future of this theory. I will compare Keller’s CBBE pyramid to five different customer-based brand equity models, particularly, I will discuss how Aaker and supporting journals differ from Keller’s model, and will explain how these differences might manifest in marketing practice. Aaker (1992) Aaker’s model conceptualizes brand equity as consisting of five different dimensions used to create value. These dimensions are: (1) brand loyalty, (2) brand name awareness, (3) perceived brand quality, (4) brand associations, and (5) brand assets. I think that while Keller’s model focuses largely on emotion, Aaker believes CBBE is built primarily through recognition. Therefore, Aaker believes that the most successful brands are one that drive recognition (e.g. Disney) while Keller believes that the most successful brands are ones that drive ...

Qantas: Could its Australian Story be its Unravelling?

Qantas is an Australian brand that uses its story as a key part of its marketing strategy, this has been effective for a number of reasons; (1) firstly , it has protected Qantas’s brand image from external factors, and (2) secondly , it has fostered a patriotic community investment in the success of the airline. However, there are potential (3) weaknesses associated with an over-reliance on brand story, in my blog I will explain how ‘brand story’ and ‘customer emotional connection’ is linked, and will explain why a customer might develop a negative ‘brand feeling’ (Keller, 2001) in response to a brand story. 1) I believe Qantas’ strong focus on their story as Australia’s most important airline has helped them create a compelling story with a clearly understood central character: the comradery and innovation of the Australian people. This has helped Qantas significantly  throughout the current Covid-19 crisis as brands that do not tell a compelling story ‘risk creating a short-t...