Skip to main content

My Reality Item: A Flat-White From Espresso Room

The consumption of my reality item suggests that the low price of a good is not indicative of a weak
relationship between the consumer and the brand. I argue that low priced goods, when consumed
frequently, fosters the development of an extremely strong brand relationship - which results in
further benefits to the consumer through customer relationships. Additionally, my reality experience
has convinced me that ‘happiness’, in the consumption context, is a combination of the core product
benefit, and the functional benefit and social benefit derived from the customer relationship (Beatty et
al., 1996). For my reality item, as money is largely a prerequisite of a customer relationship, I will
argue that money does buy ‘happiness’. 

“G’day Tom number two!”. This was the greeting I received from ‘Tom number one’, a barista at
Espresso Room, when I lined up for my daily double-shot flat-white. I have been a frequent customer
of the cafe for about a year now, each time I line up I get greeted in the same way, regardless of who
is serving me. After exchanging our standard greetings he asked: ‘double-shot flat-white?’, my usual
order, after confirming I would like my usual order, ‘Tom number one’ was very confused when I
asked him for a tax-receipt, which mixed up our standard operation. As I stood in line, ‘Tom number
one’ and myself talked about work and what we did on the weekend, in this sense, Espresso Room
treats me like a friend, rather than a customer. The purchase of this reality item demonstrates that
value is derived beyond the core benefit level of a product, but extends to brand relationship on an
emotional level (Gwinner et al., 1998)
The relationship that I have developed with Espresso Room gives me additional value through the
three benefits of relationship marketing formulated by Gwinner et al. (1998), these are: (1) increased
confidence in product and service quality, (2) social benefits in the form of recognition from
employees, and (3) special treatment in the form of a free extra shot and priority service. 

Confidence

The purchase of my reality item was enhanced by the customer relationship I have developed with
Espresso Room, which has resulted in a faith of the superior product and service experience, and
confidence that the service provider customises the product to my liking. This is demonstrated by the
cafe consistently knowing how I like my coffee. Fostering my confidence is an important brand
strategy for Espresso Room, as confidence contributes positively to perceived value of a product
(Reynolds & Beatty, 1999). This results in an increase in customer satisfaction (Berry &
Parasuraman, 1993). 

Social Benefits

Through my reality item experience Espresso Room makes me feel like a special, memorable
customer who can be distinguished from others. When I attend Espresso Room, I don’t feel like a
customer, I feel like a friend. This contributes to the social benefits derived from the relationship,
which can be described as enjoying spending time with the employees (Reynolds & Beatty, 1999).
This has important consequences for the business, I am more likely to recommend this product by
word-of-mouth to people who, like myself, would also derive benefit from a relationship with the
cafe (Gremler & Brown, 1999). 

Special Treatment

One of the most important things to me is that my loyalty in a brand relationship is rewarded. As
mentioned above, money is a prerequisite for the existence of our relationship, so receiving special
treatment increases my perceived value of the reality item. In the context of my reality item, this
special treatment came in the form of an extra free shot, and service priority over other customers.
This treatment has important ramifications for trust and commitment, both of which are important
variables in promise fulfillment and customer satisfaction (Rashid, 2003). By providing special
treatment, Espresso Room goes beyond providing what I need, and delights me by giving me more
than what I expect (Hocutt, 1998). 

Concluding Thoughts
There is more to my reality item than the core product benefit derived from the enjoyment of my
good. The culmination of many $5.00 purchases at Espresso Room has led to my service experience
being very different to a normal customer, as a result of the brand relationship with Espresso Room, I
enjoyed an additional functional and social benefit when I consumed my reality item, which
demonstrates that a low priced item does not result in a weak relationship. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Can Spotify Build Brand Equity When Music is Free?

Spotify can build brand equity as effectively as Zara, and similar brands, despite the fact that its basic offering is free and intangible in comparison. It does so because, in comparison to Zara (1) it still has the ability to develop strong brand salience, (2) it can demonstrate brand meaning through performance and imagery, and (3) is extremely effective at developing brand resonance through community engagement. Can Spotify Build Brand Identity as Effectively as Zara? Spotify is in a position to develop brand salience (brand awareness) because it can clearly describe what service category the brand competes in, and can ensure customers know which of their needs the brand is designed to satisfy (Keller, 2001). When compared to Zara, although both operate in different industries and provide for different needs, both are in a position to influence the likelihood they will form part of a customer’s usage consideration set, which is an important function of brand salience. Spot...

The Battle for CBBE: How do Other Theories Compare to Keller?

I believe that the CAA Integrated Brand Equity model by Wang et al (2008) is the best modern support for Keller’s CBBE model, and best focuses on the future of this theory. I will compare Keller’s CBBE pyramid to five different customer-based brand equity models, particularly, I will discuss how Aaker and supporting journals differ from Keller’s model, and will explain how these differences might manifest in marketing practice. Aaker (1992) Aaker’s model conceptualizes brand equity as consisting of five different dimensions used to create value. These dimensions are: (1) brand loyalty, (2) brand name awareness, (3) perceived brand quality, (4) brand associations, and (5) brand assets. I think that while Keller’s model focuses largely on emotion, Aaker believes CBBE is built primarily through recognition. Therefore, Aaker believes that the most successful brands are one that drive recognition (e.g. Disney) while Keller believes that the most successful brands are ones that drive ...

Qantas: Could its Australian Story be its Unravelling?

Qantas is an Australian brand that uses its story as a key part of its marketing strategy, this has been effective for a number of reasons; (1) firstly , it has protected Qantas’s brand image from external factors, and (2) secondly , it has fostered a patriotic community investment in the success of the airline. However, there are potential (3) weaknesses associated with an over-reliance on brand story, in my blog I will explain how ‘brand story’ and ‘customer emotional connection’ is linked, and will explain why a customer might develop a negative ‘brand feeling’ (Keller, 2001) in response to a brand story. 1) I believe Qantas’ strong focus on their story as Australia’s most important airline has helped them create a compelling story with a clearly understood central character: the comradery and innovation of the Australian people. This has helped Qantas significantly  throughout the current Covid-19 crisis as brands that do not tell a compelling story ‘risk creating a short-t...